Everyshore Intelligence Network

Michel Ferran

Michel Ferran

Corp: Ironman Inc.

Ships: Proteus, Curse

Profile last Updated at: 2025-11-01T12:19:16.417Z

Notes

Character Profile — Michel Ferran
  • Character ID: 2119926377
  • Corporation: Ironman Inc. (98460531) — no alliance
  • Snapshot date span: activity shown through 2025-10-27

Headline summary

Michel Ferran is a small‑but‑effective hunter: 20 recorded kills, 0 recorded deaths. Operates almost exclusively in a Proteus (19 uses) with one recorded use of a Curse. Activity is concentrated in Everyshore and the adjacent Sinq Laison border. Several repeated victims suggest targeted rivalries rather than purely opportunistic kills.

Kill / death statistics

  • Total kills: 20
  • Total deaths: 0 (undefeated within the dataset)
  • Solo kills: 8 (40% solo)
  • Last recorded kill: 2025-10-27T18:31:05Z

Top victims (possible grudges / recurring targets)

  • Eidur Athonille (The Free Mining Alliance Refugees / Crimson Interstellar Alliance) — 3 kills
  • Kaels (London Elektricity) — 2 kills
  • Riveller (Scan Stakan / HOLD MY PROBS) — 2 kills
  • Ainllo (T.R.I.A.D / Ushra'Khan) — 1 kill
  • Aske Djaks (Independent Chamber of Unstable Misfits) — 1 kill

Interpretation: multiple kills on Eidur Athonille, Kaels and Riveller point to ongoing, repeat targeting of those pilots or their corps/alliances. Eidur Athonille (3x) stands out as the most likely personal or corporation-level grudge.

Preferred ships and implied playstyle

  • Proteus — 19 uses (dominant platform)
  • Curse — 1 use

Implications:

  • Preference for the Proteus (T3 Strategic Cruiser) indicates flexible fits: adaptable subsystems, strong tank/skirmish capability, and the ability to tailor for PvP engagements. Michel likely uses a Proteus build optimized for survivability and selective engagements (hit-and-run or brawling against isolated targets).
  • Occasional use of a Curse suggests at least one instance of either electronic warfare/utility use, scouting/warping-in role, or a situational ship choice for a particular engagement.
  • Zero deaths and a high ratio of non-solo/team kills imply cautious engagement selection, likely avoiding large fleet fights and preferring isolated targets, small gangs, or prepared skirmishes.

Geographic focus — systems and movement

Top systems (kill counts / last activity):

  • Basgerin (Sinq Laison) — 6 kills (last 2025-10-26T22:45:13Z) — primary hotspot
  • Gerper (Everyshore) — 4 kills (last 2025-10-24T23:22:11Z)
  • Elarel (Everyshore) — 3 kills (last 2025-10-27T18:31:05Z)
  • Groothese (Everyshore) — 3 kills (last 2025-10-25T14:36:08Z)
  • Mya (Everyshore) — 3 kills (last 2025-10-25T11:57:23Z)

Interpretation:

  • Strong focus on Everyshore region with a concentrated presence around Basgerin (Sinq Laison). Basgerin is the single highest-activity system and likely a staging or hunting ground.
  • Typical movement pattern suggests operations linking Basgerin with nearby Everyshore systems (Gerper, Elarel, Groothese, Mya) — a patrol / ambush corridor along the border between Everyshore and Sinq Laison.

Temporal activity patterns

Recorded timestamps (UTC) show engagements across multiple days and times:

  • Earliest recorded times around ~11:57–15:10 UTC
  • Many events in the evening window ~18:30–23:30 UTC
  • Latest recorded activity at 22:45 UTC and 23:22 UTC on different days

Probable active window (based on dataset):

  • Broad activity: ~11:30–23:30 UTC
  • Peak likelihood: ~18:00–23:30 UTC (evening UTC)

This pattern is consistent with a pilot operating on European/UTC timezones or evening‑peak capsuleer activity in Everyshore.

Behavioral indicators and tactics

  • Highly risk‑averse: 0 deaths across 20 kills indicates conservative engagement selection, strong situational awareness, and likely use of intel/scouting before committing.
  • Target selection: repeated kills of the same pilots/corps suggest deliberate targeting (grudges or focused hunting) rather than purely random ganks.
  • Fleet role: mix of solo (8 solo kills) and group engagements; likely comfortable both hunting alone and participating in small gangs.
  • Ship doctrine: Proteus dominance points to modular, adaptable fittings — capable of medium‑range skirmish, tackle support, or controlled brawling. The single Curse use suggests occasional electronic warfare or special‑purpose ops.

Likely grudges / rivalries

Primary suspects:

  • Eidur Athonille / associates in The Free Mining Alliance Refugees / ties to Crimson Interstellar Alliance (3 kills) — top candidate for an active personal rivalry.
    Secondary:
  • Kaels (London Elektricity) and Riveller (Scan Stakan / HOLD MY PROBS) — repeated encounters (2 kills each) indicate recurring conflict or repeated opportunity exploitation.

Operational context — corporation / alliance implications

  • Michel operates from Ironman Inc., an independent corporation (no alliance listed). This supports a solo or small‑gang operational model and suggests limited large‑scale alliance backing. Independence aligns with hit-and-run / hunting behavior.

Limitations / confidence

  • Dataset is limited to recorded kills and last kill timestamps; no information on fittings, chat logs, POS activity, or other intel channels. Tactical inferences (exact fitting, cloaking, cyno use) are not confirmed by the killboard data alone.
  • Absence of deaths in the dataset may reflect incomplete loss reporting or selective reporting windows; treat “undefeated” status as high-confidence within provided data but not absolute across all EVE activity.

Profile compiled from provided killboard snapshot (last entry 2025-10-27).