MtnDew Baja Blast

MtnDew Baja Blast

Corp: Insane Buffer And Resists Mate • Alliance: Diplomatic Incidents.

Ships: Ragnarok

Profile last Updated at: 2025-10-10T13:05:48.034Z

Notes

Character Profile — MtnDew Baja Blast

Character ID: 2118740158
Name: MtnDew Baja Blast
Corporation: Insane Buffer And Resists Mate (ID 98685158)
Alliance: Diplomatic Incidents. (ID 99010312)
Last recorded kill: 2025-10-04T01:55:57Z (Everyshore / Mannar)
Totals: Kills 1 / Deaths 0 / Solo kills 0


Quick summary

  • Single recorded kill on 2025-10-04 in Mannar (Everyshore), victim: Seig Hart of Immortalis Inc. / Shadow Cartel alliance.
  • Only recorded ship used: Ragnarok (Titan) — single use recorded at time of the kill.
  • No recorded deaths and no solo kills — limited public engagement data but indicates either cautious play or a role that avoids direct fragging exposure.

Possible grudges / motives

  • Primary target: Seig Hart (characterId 275658244), affiliated with Immortalis Inc. and Shadow Cartel. The only recorded kill is against this individual, so the most likely immediate grudge or contention is against that character, their corporation, or their alliance.
    • Confidence: Medium — single data point points to a specific interaction but could be opportunistic rather than long-standing.
  • Secondary: Shadow Cartel (allianceId 495729389) — victim’s alliance. The kill could reflect a local rivalry, a one-off engagement, or involvement in a broader dispute with Shadow Cartel forces in Everyshore.
    • Confidence: Low–Medium — no other engagements recorded to confirm pattern.

Preferred ships / platform capability

  • Recorded ship: Ragnarok (Titan) — useCount 1, lastUsed 2025-10-04T01:55:57Z.
    • Implications:
      • Access to titans (either main account pilot or alt/pooled alliance asset). This implies significant ISK/force-capability or alliance-level support.
      • Role likely strategic/capital-level (bridge/jump/fleet-titans) rather than small-gang solo fragging, consistent with zero solo kills.
    • Confidence: High for access to titan capability; Moderate that it represents the player's regular preference (only a single recorded ship use).
  • No frigate/cruiser/battleship usage recorded — cannot assert preference for subcap hulls.

Systems of activity

  • Top/only system: Mannar (Everyshore) — killCount 1, lastAt 2025-10-04T01:55:57Z.
    • Indicates presence/operation in Mannar at that timestamp. Could be local staging area, a contested system, or where the relevant engagement occurred.
    • Confidence: High that there was activity in Mannar; Low that this reflects a habitual operating area (single data point).

Possible times of activity

  • Single timestamp: 2025-10-04T01:55:57Z (UTC).
    • Tentative inference: active at ~02:00 UTC. With only one data sample, broader patterns cannot be established; best guess is late-night / early-morning UTC activity for this recorded event.
    • Confidence: Low — insufficient data to establish recurring daily/weekly cadence.

Behavioral profile & operational notes

  • No recorded deaths and zero solo kills suggest either:
    • Participation in organized capital/coalition operations (where kills are often not solo and survival is managed), or
    • Extremely limited combat exposure in public records.
    • Confidence: Medium.
  • Use of a Ragnarok for the recorded engagement suggests the character either:
    • Pilots a titan themself, or
    • Is flying an alliance/coalition-provided titan (i.e., a capital-capable member or trusted pilot).
    • This implies the character has access to high-level logistics and strategic capabilities (bridging, doomsday-level presence), even if only episodically recorded.
    • Confidence: High for access; Medium for personal ownership.

Data limitations and confidence summary

  • All conclusions are drawn from a single kill event and one ship record. This yields strong confidence only in the facts recorded (victim, ship used, system, timestamp) and weak-to-moderate confidence in behavioral patterns or motives.
  • Recommended interpretation levels:
    • Factual elements (victim, ship type, system, timestamp): High confidence.
    • Inferences about grudges, habitual systems, and activity windows: Low–Medium confidence.

End of profile.